FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH TRUST IN DEEP-LEARNING-BASED THREAT DETECTION FOR ENCRYPTED DARKNET TRAFFIC
How to Cite This Article
Blessing Thomas Udoh (2026); FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH TRUST IN DEEP-LEARNING-BASED THREAT DETECTION FOR ENCRYPTED DARKNET TRAFFIC, SRJ: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, 1 (10), 21-25, ISSN: 3139-8758. DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.68295/SRJ/PTBX5261
Abstract
Encrypted traffic and anonymity-oriented networks create challenges for cybersecurity monitoring because the content of communications may not be directly inspected. This study examines factors associated with trust in deep-learning-based, real-time threat detection for encrypted darknet traffic, focusing on privacy issues, threat experience, and encryption knowledge. A mixed-method design was used, combining questionnaire responses from 151 participants with seven semi-structured interviews. The questionnaire demonstrated high overall internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.914). Pearson correlations showed positive associations between Detection Trust and Privacy Issues (r = 0.547), Threat Experience (r = 0.673), and Encryption Knowledge (r = 0.682), with reported p-values below .001. A multiple regression model was statistically significant, F(3,147) = 70.192, p < .001, and explained 58.9% of the variance in Detection Trust (R² = 0.589; adjusted R² = 0.581). Standardised coefficients reported in the thesis were β = 0.187 for Privacy Issues (p = .004), β = 0.341 for Threat Experience (p < .001), and β = 0.377 for Encryption Knowledge (p < .001). Interview analysis identified six themes concerning encrypted-traffic visibility, limitations of conventional tools, the potential of metadata-based deep learning, privacy and ethics, trust and explainability, and real-time implementation requirements. The findings concern participants’ perceptions and statistical associations; the study did not experimentally evaluate a deployed deep-learning detector or establish causal effects. The results indicate that trust-oriented system design should address privacy safeguards, transparent explanations, realistic validation, low latency, and continuous performance monitoring.
Download Article
Full Article (PDF)
Download the complete article in PDF format
Full Article PDF
Download Full Text PDF
Save this article to your device for offline reading
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.